Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 6154 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 6154 is 1534 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 6154
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 36 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 - 125 vs 200 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon Gold 6154
Server/Workstation • Jul 11th, 2017
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon Gold | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 6 |
36 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
