Key Differences
In short — Xeon Gold 5317 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon Gold 5317 is 2402 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon Gold 5317
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 223 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 5317 - 105 vs 150 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon Gold 5317
Server/Workstation • Apr 6th, 2021
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon Gold 5317 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 6th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 150 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
