Buy on Amazon
$295
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 3220 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5620 - 731 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
731
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80684I99900KF Intel Core i9-9900KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Turbo Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5620 or Core i9-9900KF
Rocket League, 1920 x 1080, High Quality
309 FPS
$5.6/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Core i9-9900KF
32 GB, 960 GB SSD + 4 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,729.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
