Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 2726 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 80 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5620 - 151 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$347.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $347.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |