Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 4677 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 49% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5620 - 133 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$419
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |