Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 3766 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 21% better in Valorant than Xeon E5620 - 817 vs 677 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
817
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$395.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $395.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |