Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 608 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 80 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5620 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
113
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$301.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $301.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |