Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5620 - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$230
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |