Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 3325 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5620 - 178 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $250.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |