Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 49 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3250 - 126 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 53 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
119
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |