Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 848 days older than Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-7100 - 206 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 51 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |