Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 29% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 108 vs 84 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 35 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
150 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |