Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-2670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 21% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2670 - 293 vs 243 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 20 vs 16 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |