Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 is 301 days older than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |