Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1213 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Xeon E5-2667 - 85 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |