Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2792 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 115 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2665 - 138 vs 115 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 127 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |