Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5350U outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5350U is 1090 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5350U - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5350U
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2665 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 15 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i5-5350U |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
No | Overclockable | No |