Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-2665 - 213 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 20 vs 16 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |