Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1098 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 105 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 29% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 98 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$560.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $560.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |