Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 294 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 32 vs 20 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |