Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Xeon E5-2660 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 30% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 303 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |