Buy on Amazon
$41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 181 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2650 - 456 vs 436 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
456
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 3.40GHz 3M SR0RH Socket 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Processor
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
