Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3591 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2643 - 208 vs 192 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2643
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
