Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2809 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 185 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
