Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 372 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 85 vs 130 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2643 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
