Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2014 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 18% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2640 - 127 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 24 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |