Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
