Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Resident Evil Village than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 304 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
304
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |