Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $612
Availability
MSRP in USD: $612
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 848 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 170 vs 161 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-7100 7th Gen Core Desktop Processor 3M Cache,3.90 GHz (BX80677I37100)
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630L v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-7100
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
