Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 179 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![[Windows 11] Dell Inspiron 3891 Desktop PC Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/pc-builds/B01DVTMAL8.jpg)
