Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 125 days older than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 47 vs 60 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 60 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
