Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630L v2 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630L v2 is 690 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |