Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 198 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
