Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2620 - 174 vs 152 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
