Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 419 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2620 - 698 vs 671 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
