Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4712MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4712MQ is 404 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-2620 - 84 vs 66 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-4712MQ
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
