Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 113% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2620 - 486 vs 228 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
