Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 85 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 234 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell-E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |