Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 313 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 319 vs 318 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
319
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |