Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1874 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 236 vs 222 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |