Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2470 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Xeon E5-2470 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 37% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-2470 v2 - 129 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2470 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
