Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v3 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v3 is 1067 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$168.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $168.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |