Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8400 is 56 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 193 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $130.73 vs $221.76
- Up to 43% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.68 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |