Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 916 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 - 265 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 85 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
