Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702HQ outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702HQ is 447 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-1620 - 394 vs 377 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 37 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702HQ |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 37 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |