Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770HQ outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770HQ is 847 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770HQ
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 - 511 vs 461 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 47 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-4770HQ
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
