Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3966 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 64% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 - 263 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |