Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1502 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 219 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$252
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |