Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 285 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1078
39.41499085923218%
Multi-Core
3819
31.152622563014926%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |