Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 188 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |